From: Joshua F. <jo...@tw...> - 2015-05-19 06:55:09
|
s3cmd du -H s3://bucketabc/prefix/further-prefix gives 21G s3cmd du -H s3://bucketabc/prefix/further-prefix/ gives 10G. There are no files directly in there, just four "subdirectories." I have five buckets which are near-copies and this only happens in two of them. The others show 10G consistently. I am moderately sure that 10G is correct. The only apparent difference between buckets -- and a seemingly irrelevant one -- is that the two which give 10G consistently have one *more* subdirectory than the ones that give 21G vs 10G; there is a single 138M file in that extra dir. Why 21G vs 10G? Thanks, Joshua (s3cmd version 1.5.0~rc1-2) |
From: Joshua F. <jo...@tw...> - 2015-05-20 06:16:01
|
OK, it's just because the version without slash serves as a wild card for other directories with this string as a prefix. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Joshua Fox <jo...@tw...> wrote: > s3cmd du -H s3://bucketabc/prefix/further-prefix > > gives 21G > > s3cmd du -H s3://bucketabc/prefix/further-prefix/ > > gives 10G. > > There are no files directly in there, just four "subdirectories." > > I have five buckets which are near-copies and this only happens in two of > them. The others show 10G consistently. I am moderately sure that 10G is > correct. > > The only apparent difference between buckets -- and a seemingly irrelevant > one -- is that the two which give 10G consistently have one *more* subdirectory > than the ones that give 21G vs 10G; there is a single 138M file in that > extra dir. > > Why 21G vs 10G? > > Thanks, > > Joshua > > (s3cmd version 1.5.0~rc1-2) > > |