From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2011-08-19 13:48:38
|
The following forum message was posted by christical at http://sourceforge.net/projects/s3tools/forums/forum/618865/topic/4664897: Hi everyone I tried to look for a topic about this but couldn't find any. Sorry if it has already been discussed. I noticed something odd : depending on the use or not of --no-progress, I have quite a different result in term of transfer speed. For instance, the upload of a 2GB file : # s3cmd put 2GBfile s3://test/ 2GBfile -> s3://test/2GBfile [1 of 1] 2147479552 of 2147479552 100% in 220s 9.28 MB/s done # s3cmd --no-progress put 2GBfile s3://test/ File '2GBfile' stored as 's3://test/2GBfile' (2147479552 bytes in 28.9 seconds, 70.96 MB/s) [1 of 1] Same thing with download : # s3cmd get s3://test/2GBfile s3://test/2GBfile -> ./2GBfile [1 of 1] 2147479552 of 2147479552 100% in 221s 9.26 MB/s done # s3cmd --no-progress get s3://test/2GBfile File s3://test/2GBfile saved as './2GBfile' (2147479552 bytes in 19.1 seconds, 107.15 MB/s) Those are the latest tests I ran but I got similar results everytime. I'm using s3cmd with a Scality cloud (S3 like). Do any of you guys noticed this behavior ? Any idea how --progress (activated by default) works ? Christian |