Re: [Rubydotnet-developer] [ANN] Ruby/.NET bridge release 4 now available

[Rodrigo B. de O. <rb...@ac...>]

Sorry for the confusion...

I meant I'm now using rubydotnet[1] instead of RubyDotNet[2] (I hope you are
case sensitive readers ;-)), in other words, I find it far more intuitive to
have .NET namespaces translated to ruby modules.

best regards,
Rodrigo

[1] http://sf.net/projects/rubydotnet
[2] http://www.saltypickle.com/rubydotnet

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Sondergaard" <th...@th...>
To: <rub...@li...>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: [Rubydotnet-developer] [ANN] Ruby/.NET bridge release 4 now
available


> > >Well, I don't know how this will sound but I must tell you that I
> > >switched bridges because of the namespace flattening behavior alone.
> >
> > I wasn't sure from your message which bridge you were now
> > using - whether you preferred the flattening or the modules.
> > Could you say a little more about your thoughts?
>
> I read it as if he favoured the namespace flattening. But now you
> mention it, I can see that it is a little ambiguous.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom
>