Re: [Rubydotnet-developer] rubydotnet - first announcement

[Thomas S. <th...@th...>]

> Agreed.  So what would make working with our project easier?  We have
released
> the source code in the distribution. As for SCM, we currently have the
source
> code in a private Perforce Depot.  I made arrangements with Perforce for
this
> open source project and got free licenses to run this project on Perforce.
The
> Perforce depot could be opened up to other developers. I tend to like
Perforce
> more than CVS, anyways. Is the fact that we use Perforce instead of CVS a
big
> deal to you?
>

When I presented the rationale for starting my own project I neglected to
mention that I'm working on an article describing the use of managed C++ to
implement a ruby/.net interop solution. Until I'm further along with the
article I'll be working in my own sandbox.

As for SCM it is not important which system it is, as long as it is
available freely (as in beer).

Oh, I also wanted to ask John and Ben whether it would be okay if I borrowed
a bit of code from your DynamicDelegate class. My extension module uses the
ruby license which is more liberal than GPL.

Cheers,

Thomas