Re: [Rubycocoa-talk] Web server inside a RubyCocoa App

[Eloy D. <elo...@gm...>]

I would however use webrick first and switch to mongrel if you really  
need the extra speed. Because mongrel uses a C extension it will take  
a bit more work to bundle it and adds approx. 1mb to your app size.

Eloy

On 18-nov-2007, at 14:45, Tim Perrett <he...@ti...> wrote:

> Hey Eloy, Alistair,
>
> Im sure this topic has come up before on the list.
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=BDCAF4E2-E8BB-451F-9257-65AF07DC8D26%40timperrett.com
>
> Although its Rails, not camping - but doesn't camping use Mongrel as
> the HTTP server also?
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim
>
> On 17 Nov 2007, at 14:46, elo...@gm... wrote:
>
>> Hey Alistair,
>>
>>
>> Standaloneify will already do this for you. Only one catch is that if
>> you are going to fork the process standalonify will never know  of  
>> the
>> dependencies. So you have to require the depencies in your app as  
>> well
>> when running standaloneify. Other than that it works great in an app
>> I'm working on.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eloy
>
>
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Rubycocoa-talk mailing list
> Rub...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rubycocoa-talk