From: Tim P. <he...@ti...> - 2007-07-24 10:33:47
|
Just bringing this thread back for a moment... I know we were discussing natively compiled gems such as hpricot and libxml-ruby, but then I got to thinking that these are two very different propositions. hpricot just has C extensions that need to be compiled, where as libxml ruby actually needs to find compiled libxml2 libraries on the path in order to work. Would I then be wrong in thinking that it needs those libraries (libxml2, iconv etc) to operate rather than just compile? If so, they would also need to be packaged would they not? As a universal binary also? I found this nice link too... http://www.complex-computer.de/ albumshaper/wiki/index.php/Compiling_on_OSX#Compiling_libxml2 Cheers Tim |