Re: [Rubycocoa-talk] rubycocoa game example

[Tim B. <tim...@gm...>]

Jonathan,

yes, that suggestion sounds great, especially since it would make  
things symmetric.

Tim

On Feb 23, 2006, at 12:48 AM, Jonathan Paisley wrote:

>
> On 22 Feb 2006, at 23:56, Tim Burks wrote:
>
>> I'd prefer to have the bridge automatically convert "object=" into  
>> "setObject" calls, perhaps as an option.
>
> There are two directions to consider here:
>
>   ObjC calling to Ruby for 'setFoo' to call 'foo='. This is handled  
> by kvc_accessor.
>
>   Ruby calling 'foo=' on an ObjC object to call 'setFoo'. This  
> isn't handled yet.
>
> The latter could be fixed by extending the 'analyze_missing' method  
> in oc_wrapper.rb. Do you think that would be sufficient?
>
>