From: Sean L. <se...@da...> - 2005-09-16 13:49:07
|
On 16 Sep 2005, at 15:41, Jonathan Paisley wrote: > > Yes, those were added after 0.4.1. I think there are quite a few > limitations in 0.4.1 release that make things hard! The current CVS > has got some nice features added though (like my exception-wrapping > patch, which stops applications from dying unexpectedly if any > uncaught ruby exceptions occur). :) I'll have to take another look over CVS head for such goodies... >>> I still think cocoa_depends_on is useful since it has far nicer >>> syntax, and can easily be reimplemented in terms of >>> setKeys_trigger... once that works. >>> >> >> OK, sounds like a good idea. I no longer have any basis for >> asserting that setKeys_trigger... doesn't work anymore, it seems >> fine. >> > > Would 'kvc_depends_on' be a better name, to match up with the other > kvc_* methods? Agreed. Sean -- Sean Legassick se...@da... |