From: Steven A. <st...@ar...> - 2009-03-11 00:12:58
|
On Mar 10, 2009, at 7:06 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote: > Yes, whilst your right about the legitimate aspect - remember in legal > terms there is no notion of illegitimate being in anyway "ok". lol. > > Whilst it's true that people will always find ways to hack this device > - apple will no doubt find ever more legal bean counters to stop > people doing so. I read the Apple iPhone SDK EULA at http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/iphone.pdf and I do not see anything in it that suggests that only Apple- provided tools may be used to create iPhone apps. In fact, I don't even see anything that says you may only distribute an iPhone app via the iTunes App Store. If I'm missing some language in the EULA, please correct me. My take: there is nothing in the EULA to prevent a tool that creates an iPhone app via Ruby. While such a tool could possibly be used for "illegitimate" purposes (e.g. an app for use on jailbroken devices), let's not forget that ALL so-called illegitimate apps that exist today were created using XCode and Objective-C. Allowing iPhone apps to be created using Ruby would not add any capability for illegitimate activity that does not already exist today. steven |