From: Jason F. <ja...@th...> - 2008-06-26 13:51:56
|
On Jun 26, 2008, at 8:41 AM, Marcelo Alves wrote: > I don't think the statement #3.3.2 forbids the use of another > languages. If your app bundles the ruby interpreter inside, there's no > download, and you're not launching another executable. Not sure I agree with you; I think it does prohibit it, albeit in some very vague and possibly ambiguous language. But IANAL, so who knows. Also keep in mind that they have the power to just reject your app for inclusion in the App Store anyway, so I'm not sure it is worth the effort to build an iPhone app using RubyCocoa at this time. I spoke to some Apple engineers at WWDC, and none of them seemed opposed to having RubyCocoa (or PyObjC) on the iPhone. Best way to make it happen is to file bugs. They'll probably be closed as dupes, but the more they get, the higher chance there is of it happening. Jason |