From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-10-21 15:22:33
|
Hi, On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:06:43 +0800 "Joshua Keith" <jos...@li...> wrote: > >* Deprecated/Obsolete/Enable broken classes/methods >will be all removed before 0.1 will be released. > >* setter/getter/is_ methods have some rules. > >See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/naming.html > > > Are you working from the old ruby/GTK src, or is this all new source? (just wondering, as the source is where I pulled all of my information from). New source. Because Ruby/GTK2 and Ruby/GTK2 have a few compatiblity. > >If there are some methods which do not follow the > >rules that'll be bug(please tell me you find such >methods). > >Now I have checked about it in Ruby/GTK. > >See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html. > > > I will certianlly tell you of any bugs that I find. Thanks. > I am working on an example application now that will hopefully contain most, > if not all of the methods and all widgets. I find it helpful to actually see > what things do before I start playing with them. When It is completed, > I'll send you the src. Cool. > >* Some methods have aliases. For example > >Gtk::CellRendererToggle#active=, #set_active. > >It is better to collect them in a class. > >* How do you think about >signals/properties/constants/etc... ? > > > Everything will be broken down by the final release of the docs, > including signals, properties, constants, and public/private methods. > This version is pre-alpha at best, and was just sent to provide proof > that I am working on the docs. It was not intended as a final release (by far), > especially with the code still being CVS and the API likely to undergo changes. I see. > >BTW, Do you create Gtk.rd by hand? > >rbbr's library(especially metainfo) may help you. > > > Yes. I pulled everything from the included source code (hence why I found the typos) > I will take a look at rbbr when I get the chance :) > > >I attempt sample.rb(and result.txt) which creates >all class/methods list of Ruby/GTK, GLib, GDK. > >As this is sample, you may change it for your >documents. But I think it's easy. > > > I'll take a look at it, but I think I have pulled almost everything out of the gtk source(perhaps more ;) than I need. > > >After installing rbbr in CVS, check it. > >#Ruby is so cool ... I feel again:->. > > > I will take a look at it. I've only one more method on GtkWindow before > it is completed (in it's current form). Will functions such as 'gtk_window_add_mnemonic ()', 'gtk_window_stick ()', 'gtk_window_set_icon ()' be making an appearance, or is it free to > be added by a 3rd party? They'll be all implemented until released Ruby-GNOME2 1.0. Also someone can make patch:->. Have you already checked "Ruby-GNOME2 Milestones and Status Matrix" ? (See http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.net/status.html) # Maybe you couldn't understand my English ... Please point out it;-> -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |