From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-09-15 12:03:41
|
Hi, On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:31:32 +0200 Markus Jais <mj...@we...> wrote: > just on more question for my understanding. > why is glib2 needed. I thought this has only some convenient types > and memory routines for C programmers. > why is this needed for ruby?? > just curious! Hmm ... glib package(not ruby) includes glib, gmodule, gobject, gthread. I think we do not need to implement glib. Because almost of the functions will not use with Ruby. But we need gobject and some other functions in glib package. Especially GObject <-> Ruby conversion is very important part of Ruby-GNOME2. At first, I thought separated 'glib' and 'gobject', but it became to overdo, it was enough one library. So I decided this to use here as glib package name. And I think other utility functions which will be used whole of Ruby-GNOME2 define in Ruby/GLib. It makes easy to implement Ruby/GTK and other library which support GType system. But I read your comment, it may be better to separate 'glib', 'gobject', and utilty functions ... Any comments? -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |