From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2002-08-07 17:30:51
|
Hi, On Wed, 07 Aug 2002 12:04:09 -0500 Darrin Thompson <dth...@ch...> wrote: > Did your decision to not use SWIG take into consideration the recent > developments there? From what I've read on the english ruby-talk list, > SWIG 1.3 is turning into a really excellent tool and the ruby to c code > generator is excellent. Perhaps you all should reconsider? When I started Ruby-GNOME2, I decided to make Ruby-GNOME2 be not wrapper of GNOME2. Some methods will be named more ruby-like, Constants will be also changed. So I decided to write Ruby-GNOME2 by hand. But if you write Ruby-GNOME2 using SWIG and it'll become cool, I may accept it. Cheers. -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |