From: Guillaume C. <gco...@gm...> - 2008-10-27 10:08:33
|
> I couldn't understand why RC style releasing can fix the > problem but odd release number as development releasing > (GTK+'s release style) cannot fix the problem. > > stable release: 0.18.0 -> 0.18.1 -> ............. -> 0.20.0 > development release: 0.19.0 -> 0.19.1 -> ... -> 0.19.x ^ > trunk: ^ .....^ ........^......^ ................. > > I think if we say "0.19.x will be 0.20.0 if no problem" in > 0.19.x release announce, we will get same benefit of RC > style releasing. Did I misunderstand what you mean...? Ah, ok. I assumed it would be like Linux, e.g. a series of 0.19.x of unstable quality, then a series of 0.20.x of stable quality - e.g. 0.20.0 then 0.20.1 then 0.20.2. My point with in that situation, it is not good for testing 0.20.2 and avoiding regressions. If there is always a 0.19.x before 0.20.x, then your proposal is good, I agree! >> http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.jp/hiki.cgi?Applications > > Thanks!!! np. >> Maybe it could be linked also from the left menu bar? > > Please do! Sorry, I don't know how to edit the left menu bar! -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://zarb.org/~gc/ |