Le 25 février 2012 07:20, Masaaki Aoyagi <masaakiaoyagi@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hi, Vincent.

Great work!

A few comments though:

* I think GTK_TYPE_MESSAGE_TYPE should be defined as Gtk::MessageType.
(similar to Gtk::PositionType and others)
Just for your information, I've attached enum list.

* I think GTK_TYPE_RESPONSE_TYPE should be defined as Gtk::ResponseType.

Sorry for too late reply.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
ruby-gnome2-devel-en mailing list
ruby-gnome2-devel-en@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ruby-gnome2-devel-en



Hi Masaaki

Thanks for your compliment.
I agree that GTK_TYPE_MESSAGE_TYPE should be defined as Gtk::MessageType
but they are all ready defined as Gtk::MessageDialog::Type that is why I
redefined it as Gtk::InfoBar::Type.
I propose to define GTK_TYPE_MESSAGE_TYPE as Gtk::MessageType, 
keep Gtk::MessageDialog::Type for compatibility sake and remove
Gtk::InfoBar::Type as no one except me should have write code
including this constant.

--
Vincent Carmona