Takaaki Tateishi wrote:
> Now I am not interested in developing ruby-fltk. So I'd like someone
> to take it over from me. Does anyone want to develop ruby-fltk?
I am interested in doing it, but first I need to resolve the IP issues
with my employer. I believe (based on previous discussions with them)
that there will be no problem, but I'd like to get it in writing
before making any major contribution to an Open Source project.
Better safe than sorry.
I think Ruby-FLTK is already pretty good as it stands. The main
issues I have are: the build breaks under a modern Ruby (I had to hack
cxx.rb and extconf.rb), and it seems incomplete (several useful FLTK
calls are not exposed in the Ruby interface).
If anyone else has any suggestions about what needs to be done, please
let me know!
I'll post again as soon I have the necessary assurances from my
employer.
Cheers,
Jeremy Henty
|