From: Takaaki T. <tt...@ja...> - 2001-09-07 05:28:30
|
At Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Kevin Smith wrote: > The first time I tried to use destroy, I got a segfault. > Have you tested it much? Is it the correct way to remove > and get rid of a widget that I previously created? I guess a handle method returns the false after calling a destroy method. I've found such code cause a segmentation fault. Now I don't know how do we fix it. But I will make the handle method always return true, if the widget is not valid. -- Takaaki Tateishi <tt...@ja...> |