From: Takaaki T. <tt...@ja...> - 2001-08-29 05:08:13
|
At Sun, 26 Aug 2001 20:33:06 -0700 (PDT), Kevin Smith wrote: > > As fltk.so usually installed in the ruby's directory like > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i686-linux/fltk.so, I think the > > administrator can find it is a ruby's library. > > > > Yes, we can create a `fltk.rb' with `fltk.so'. If we load > > the `fltk.so' from `fltk.rb', we can write: > > > > require "fltk.o" > > Hmmm. I guess that's ok, as long as it works under Windows > and Mac as well as Linux. Why do you prefer this over > fltk.rb and rubyfltk.so? Yes, this should work on any plathome. But now I don't deprecate your opinion. let's use the name 'rubyfltk.so'. -- Takaaki Tateishi <tt...@ja...> |