Re: [ruby-fltk-devel] fltk.so?

[Kevin S. <kev...@ya...>]

--- Takaaki Tateishi <tt...@ja...> wrote:
> As fltk.so usually installed in the ruby's directory like
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.6/i686-linux/fltk.so, I think the
> administrator can find it is a ruby's library.
> 
> Yes, we can create a `fltk.rb' with `fltk.so'. If we load
> the `fltk.so' from `fltk.rb', we can write:
> 
>   require "fltk.o"

Hmmm. I guess that's ok, as long as it works under Windows
and Mac as well as Linux. Why do you prefer this over
fltk.rb and rubyfltk.so?

> Ruby/Gtk and Ruby/Qt make `gtk.so' and `qt.so', but I've
> never  heard any problem about these libraries.

I didn't like the naming of Ruby/Gtk. In that case, on
Windows, you had the Gtk dlls, and then the Ruby/Gtk dlls,
and it was somewhat confusing.

I'm not sure they are correct, either. Perhaps we should
ask the Ruby mailing list which would be better?

Kevin

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/