From: Kevin S. <kev...@ya...> - 2001-08-25 15:06:37
|
I think I mentioned this earlier, but I wanted to know what you think about it. Right now, we have fltk.so. For a system administrator, they would have no way to know that this is related to ruby. Also, there are some extensions to ruby-fltk that I would like to write in ruby itself (like a GraphicContext class). So, can we create a little fltk.rb (that just has require 'rubyfltk'), and then rename the main library to rubyfltk.so? Kevin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ |