Re: [ruby-fltk-devel] Mapping C++ objects to Ruby objects

[Kevin S. <kev...@ho...>]

On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Takaaki Tateishi wrote:
> I've tried to implement the above class, but some problems are found.
> if we implement classes RBFL_Xxxx and RBFL_Yyyy, RBFL_Yyyy is a subclass
> of the class RBFL_Xxxx, we obtain the following class hierarchy.
> 
> Fl_Xxxxx -------> RBFL_Xxxxx
>    |
>    |
>    V
> Fl_Yyyyy -------> RBFL_Yyyyy

That seems fine, as long as we don't need RBFL_Yyyyy to inherit from
RBLF_Xxxxx. I thought about this some, and couldn't think of a reason we
needed it. 

> class RBFl_Yyyy : public Fl_Yyyy, public RBFl_Xxxx {
>   ...
> }

Do we need our wrappers to inherit from each other? If not, I'd prefer to
avoid having parallel hierarchies.

> I prefer short name. how about `RBFLXxx'?

Sounds good to me.

Kevin