RFCs are finally Published!
The transport header in the setup request would indicate multicast and an address....
I think that would be implementation specific. It should be possible to define a...
I think that would be implementation specific. It should be possible to define a...
Also if this means on a per stream basis the that is a sdp definition.
I think its more than an advisory it tells you that the server can't send more then...
I think that certain content types need be specified and if that is done then whatever...
What's wrong with 500 or 501 and your own header or body?
Why is this needed? Announce / record can already can handle this afaik. Additionally...
This is implementation specific. The client would have to issue a setup anyway how...
I would settle for the same transport header which would otherwise be received in...
I would settle for the same transport header which would otherwise be received in...
Wouldn't a mux be indicated by supplying the appropriate client and server port for...
There are also issues in the draft, specifically where rtsp expansion is defined....
There are also issues in the draft, specifically where rtsp expansion is defined....
Safe character '$' in interleaved or tunneled communication causes data losses