rtnet-developers

[RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[<kle...@gm...>]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:11:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>'core' may be a disadvantageous name....perhaps configure tries to
> >>>delete 'core'-files from segfauled processes etc...

> >>Yes, there are some code about this in configure. What to do? Do you 
> >>have a better name at hand?
> >rtnet-core
> Mmh, then we end up with the RTAI 3.0 way: rtnet-xxx or rtnet_xxx. What 
> about "stack"? I think this also hits the mark.

I've renamed core to stack, and commited to svn

Marc

P.S.: still 2.4 only :)

-- 
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \
shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\
echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh

[RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[Jan K. <ki...@rt...>]

Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> 
> I've renamed core to stack, and commited to svn
> 

Looks and compiles very nice!

Jan

Re: [RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[<kle...@gm...>]

Hi!

I've just commited the latest changes to svn. This is the first
linux-2.6 enabled version. Feel free to test and comment :)

Jan, please have a look at the deprecated MOD_INC/DEC_USE_COUNT
warnings. There is also undefined __MOD_INC_USE_COUNT.

NOTE: This warnings effect only RTnet with linux-2.6.x

Marc

-- 
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \
shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\
echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh

Re: [RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[<kle...@gm...>]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:44:13PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> I've just commited the latest changes to svn. This is the first
> linux-2.6 enabled version. Feel free to test and comment :)

smc91111 is not working - any volunteers :)
I've forgotten to convert rtai_rtdm - I'll do this tomorrow.

> NOTE: This warnings effect only RTnet with linux-2.6.x

Marc

-- 
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \
shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\
echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh

Re: [RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[Jan K. <jan...@we...>]

Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:44:13PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> 
>>I've just commited the latest changes to svn. This is the first
>>linux-2.6 enabled version. Feel free to test and comment :)
> 

Great! I will check what the compiler doesn't like.

> 
> smc91111 is not working - any volunteers :)

Will have a look. Mmh, just wondering if we may once have 2.6 with RTnet 
on that SSV board with smc91111 we recently bought for a student's thesis...

> I've forgotten to convert rtai_rtdm - I'll do this tomorrow.
> 

Ok, I think there is already enough to fix for me :)

Jan

Re: [RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[<kle...@gm...>]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:15:56PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>I've just commited the latest changes to svn. This is the first
> >>linux-2.6 enabled version. Feel free to test and comment :)

> >I've forgotten to convert rtai_rtdm - I'll do this tomorrow.

fixed in svn

Marc

-- 
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \
shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\
echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh

Re: [RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[Jan K. <ki...@rt...>]

Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

>fixed in svn
>
>  
>
Good. And I'm currently testing a solution for that USE_COUNT issue. 
rtnet_rtpc.c is already fixed and will be uploaded soon.

Jan

Re: [RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[Jan K. <ki...@rt...>]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> 
>> fixed in svn
>>
>>  
>>
> Good. And I'm currently testing a solution for that USE_COUNT issue. 
> rtnet_rtpc.c is already fixed and will be uploaded soon.
> 

Well, if I did not oversee something, we should have a cleanly compiling 
RTnet for kernel 2.6 now!

I did not tested anything yet, and there are a few drivers remaining to 
be fixed. However, I'm surprised that it was that simple to migrate the 
source code (not knowing how much work it took for you, Marc).

Jan