Re: [RTnet-developers] SO_TIMESTAMPNS for RTnet

[Jan K. <jan...@we...>]

On 2013-06-16 20:13, Manuel Huber wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Sorry for the delay, I tried to build a patch for RTAI as well... I have
> written a
> request to the RTAI Mailing List...
> 
> I'll wait for the RTAI guys to answer the request, and then send the
> patch to the Xenomai
> mailing list (or is it sufficient to just send you a short mail?). I
> believe it's important
> that both projects use RTDM the same.

Sure, but - just like for the kernel patches - development takes place
in Xenomai. RTAI usually picks up once upstream has merged it. So push
you Xenomai patch first.

> 
> I think I will rebase the actual modification in RTnet (timestamping)
> once again to
> match the style of previous changes in RTnet. Is it a problem that I
> first add a new
> source file (commit 1) and then recreate autotools configuration and change
> GNUmakefile.am in a second commit (commit 2)? Commit 1 will not build...

No, this is how I merge stuff as well. Autotools diffs get too huge and
make patch review too hard.

Jan