Did this (and the other) patch arrive well on the list? Is this the proper
way for submitting patches to RTnet?
Regards,
Arnout
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 11:32:28, Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
wrote:
> From: "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" <ar...@mi...>
>
> If we use ccache, CROSS_COMPILE will be something like "ccache gccprefix".
> If we don't quote the argument, then the sub-make will use "ccache" as the
> cross-compile prefix and will try to build "gccprefix"
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <ar...@mi...>
> ---
> configure.ac | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 81107f5..86a72fd 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ else
> fi;
> \ done; \
> \$(MAKE) -C $RTEXT_LINUX_DIR \ -
> CROSS_COMPILE=\$(CROSS_COMPILE) \
> + CROSS_COMPILE=\"\$(CROSS_COMPILE)\"
> \ ARCH=\$(RTNET_TARGET_ARCH) \
> M=\"\`pwd\`\" \ V=\$(V)
> \ @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@
> AC_SUBST(RTNET_KBUILD_CLEAN)
> AC_SUBST(RTNET_KBUILD_DISTCLEAN)
>
> bs_kmodext=$RTNET_MODULE_EXT
> -bs_kcompile="make -C $RTEXT_LINUX_DIR ARCH=$RTNET_TARGET_ARCH
> CROSS_COMPILE=$CROSS_COMPILE V=1 M=`pwd` SUBDIRS=`pwd` modules"
> +bs_kcompile="make -C $RTEXT_LINUX_DIR ARCH=$RTNET_TARGET_ARCH
> CROSS_COMPILE=\"$CROSS_COMPILE\" V=1 M=`pwd` SUBDIRS=`pwd` modules"
>
>
> dnl ======================================================================
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 31BB CF53 8660 6F88 345D 54CC A836 5879 20D7 CF43
|