Re: [RTnet-developers] RT IRQ sharing

[Marcelo C. <mjc...@cr...>]

Hi!


> Don't understand yet what you mean, but the original locking at the
> interrupt handler tail is correct and should not be changed by your
patch.

Forget it. I thought I saw the saved_state variable outside that
function.


I've been seeing the kernel driver and it has some differences, namely,
it has support for the BUF_IDX different from 2 (which I included).
Don't know if that is necessary.

But, for now I don't have time for more. I think that this patch should
solve the situation, but I still have to test with a system.

Next week, maybe I'll have some spare time to port the kernel driver.



Thanks for the help,
Marcelo