Re: [RTnet-developers] Documentation request

[Marcelo J c. <mjc...@cr...>]

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Marcelo J coelho wrote:
>   
>>> Maybe you should start with considering what functionality you most
>>> urgently need from the new IP-SOCK_RAW interface, from the application
>>> point of view. Then have a look (...) and at similar functions for UDP and
>>> packet sockets under RTnet. Try to understand the pattern, the usual
>>> information flow, and adopt the Linux functions.
>>>       
>> Should i follow the udp or icmp implementation more closely?
>>
>>     
>
> UDP, ICMP is not directly exported to the user, especially not via RTDM.
> Also that packet sockets are interesting, although they have nothing to
> do with IP. They are simpler usage example than UDP/IP, and the data
> flow should be easily to understand.
>   
I didn't quite understand what you wanted to say. Should I use another
kind of example, is it?


> I guess there is nothing you can do about this footer when posting to
> public lists, is it?
>   
The only way is to use another e-mail (and gmail started to give me some
 problems.... :(    ).



DISCLAIMER: This message may contain confidential information or privileged material and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not a named addressee and mistakenly received this message you should not copy or otherwise disseminate it: please delete this e-mail from your system and notify the sender immediately. E-mail transmissions are not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete or contain viruses. Therefore, the sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that arise as a result of e-mail transmissions. Please request a hard copy version if verification is required. Critical Software.