Re: [RTnet-developers] Documentation request

[Jan K. <jan...@we...>]

Marcelo J coelho wrote:
>> Maybe you should start with considering what functionality you most
>> urgently need from the new IP-SOCK_RAW interface, from the application=

>> point of view. Then have a look (...) and at similar functions for UDP=
 and
>> packet sockets under RTnet. Try to understand the pattern, the usual
>> information flow, and adopt the Linux functions.
> Should i follow the udp or icmp implementation more closely?
>=20

UDP, ICMP is not directly exported to the user, especially not via RTDM.
Also that packet sockets are interesting, although they have nothing to
do with IP. They are simpler usage example than UDP/IP, and the data
flow should be easily to understand.

>=20
>=20
>> BTW, for the overall picture of RTnet's data flow, there is that ETFA
>> paper on the documentation page on www.rtnet.org.
>>  =20
> Already read it.  :)
>=20
>=20
>=20
> DISCLAIMER: This message may contain confidential information or privil=
eged material and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you ar=
e not a named addressee and mistakenly received this message you should n=
ot copy or otherwise disseminate it: please delete this e-mail from your =
system and notify the sender immediately. E-mail transmissions are not gu=
aranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, =
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete or contain viruses.=
 Therefore, the sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissi=
ons in the contents of this message that arise as a result of e-mail tran=
smissions. Please request a hard copy version if verification is required=
=2E Critical Software.

I guess there is nothing you can do about this footer when posting to
public lists, is it?

Jan