[RTnet-developers] Re: [RTnet-users] Thoughts on new source layout

[<kle...@gm...>]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:11:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>'core' may be a disadvantageous name....perhaps configure tries to
> >>>delete 'core'-files from segfauled processes etc...

> >>Yes, there are some code about this in configure. What to do? Do you 
> >>have a better name at hand?
> >rtnet-core
> Mmh, then we end up with the RTAI 3.0 way: rtnet-xxx or rtnet_xxx. What 
> about "stack"? I think this also hits the mark.

I've renamed core to stack, and commited to svn

Marc

P.S.: still 2.4 only :)

-- 
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 'tr "[a-zA-Z]" "[n-za-mN-ZA-M]"';while [ "$2" != "" ];do \
shift;done; echo 'frq -a -rc '`echo "$0"| $1 `'>$UBZR/.`rpub signature|'`\
echo $1|$1`'`;rpub "Jr ner fvtangher bs obet. Erfvfgnapr vf shgvyr!"'|$1|sh