[Rstplib-users] RE: 802.1w: double flushing in simplest case ?
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
ralex
From: Vipin J. <vi...@te...> - 2002-01-03 17:11:28
|
Albina, RSTP or bridging does not interfere with routing function. I suspect that you are talking about a bridge-router (brouter as it used to be called). RSTP is a no-op in a pure router. In a brouter, you do not need to unresolve ARP entries or next hop information. Typically, you would have a number of bridged ports (part of the same layer 2 domain) and an IP interface (virtualized) sitting on top of each such set of ports. Next hop in a routing table will point to this virtual IP interface as the outbound interface. ARP resolution is also above the bridging function and hence does not need to change irrespective of what happens to bridge ports in the domain. All it means is that a packet will be submitted to an appropriate IP interface for forwarding, you also know the MAC address of next hop router, just do not know which physical (bridge) port the packet should go out of. Because addresses have been flushed on these bridge ports, such a packet will be flooded in the corresponding layer 2 domain. Of course, if you change the IP address to MAC address association for a device, no bridging will help you. That's why you have mechanisms such as gratuitous ARP (all layer 3 functions). Hope it helps. Vipin -----Original Message----- From: Albina Krigma-Lee [mailto:alb...@ya...] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Tony Jeffree Cc: std...@ie...; rst...@li... Subject: Re: 802.1w: double flushing in simplest case ? I see, but it seems that learning entries flushing/ageing must unresolve ARP entries and NextHops in FIB. So I quess, the double flushing could be really expencive cost of RSTP. Or Alex isn't right ? Sincerely, Albina Krigma-Lee --- Tony Jeffree <to...@je...> wrote: > The RSTP standard defines the operation of RSTP > bridges - it has nothing to=20 > say on the subject of routers. >=20 > Regards, > Tony >=20 > At 00:05 04/01/2002 +1100, Albina Krigma-Lee wrote: >=20 > >Hi All, > >If RSTP operates in a router and makes flush() > >function, do it have to delete Forwarding > Information > >Base (FIB) entries too ? > > > >Thanks in advance, albina > > > > > >http://my.yahoo.com.au - My Yahoo! > >- It's My Yahoo! Get your own! >=20 > =20 http://my.yahoo.com.au - My Yahoo! - It's My Yahoo! Get your own! |