[Rstplib-users] Re: 802.1w: double flushing in simplest case ?

[<alb...@ya...>]

I see, but it seems that learning entries
flushing/ageing must unresolve ARP entries and
NextHops in FIB. So I quess, the double
flushing could be really expencive cost of RSTP.
Or Alex isn't right ?
Sincerely, Albina Krigma-Lee

 --- Tony Jeffree <to...@je...> wrote:
> The RSTP standard defines the operation of RSTP
> bridges - it has nothing to 
> say on the subject of routers.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony
> 
> At 00:05 04/01/2002 +1100, Albina Krigma-Lee wrote:
> 
> >Hi All,
> >If RSTP operates in a router and makes flush()
> >function, do it have to delete Forwarding
> Information
> >Base (FIB) entries too ?
> >
> >Thanks in advance, albina
> >
> >
> >http://my.yahoo.com.au - My Yahoo!
> >- It's My Yahoo! Get your own!
> 
>  

http://my.yahoo.com.au - My Yahoo!
- It's My Yahoo! Get your own!