From: Danny A. <dan...@vi...> - 2003-02-25 10:14:19
|
> Joe, the only issue with applying this patch is that I'm not sure what > it's solving. You're adding the item to the sequence, and the *main* > difference I see is that you're using the item LINK instead of the item > ABOUT data... and those should be the same reference. Am I missing > something? The resource in the seq should the the same as the 'about', see : http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/spec#s5.3.5 According to the spec : "{item_uri} should be identical to the value of the <link> sub-element of the <item> element, if possible.". So although in most circumstances the 'about' will be the same as the <link>, this isn't necessarily always the case (this was discussed a while ago on rss-dev). (Personally I'd prefer that the specs made the <link> element optional, so that self-contained items like many on blog posts were covered better, the thing being described being the 'about' resource, without reference to any external URL). Cheers, DAnny. |