From: Joseph O. <jo...@en...> - 2003-02-25 06:54:06
|
Joe, the only issue with applying this patch is that I'm not sure what it's solving. You're adding the item to the sequence, and the *main* difference I see is that you're using the item LINK instead of the item ABOUT data... and those should be the same reference. Am I missing something? On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Joseph Shelby wrote: > private void addItemsRef(Element channel, List is) { > if(is!=null && is.size()>0) { > Element items=channel.addElement("items"); > Element seq=items.addElement("rdf", "Seq"); > Iterator iter=is.iterator(); > while(iter.hasNext()) { > Item item=(Item)iter.next(); > // addItem(seq, item, "resource"); > Element li = seq.addElement("li"); > li.setAttribute("rdf", "resource", item.getLink()); > } > } > } > > that now follows the rdf:Seq->li syntax described by O'Reilly's > page > > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2000/08/25/magazine/rss_tut.html?page=3 > > Joe > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger jo...@en... http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant |