[Rss-desk-development] Re: talking about the build
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
bel70
|
From: clay g. <cg...@ne...> - 2004-05-14 15:36:45
|
Sorry Dmitry, I only saw one mailing list on sourceforge, because it didn't have the the folder on it I missed it. My fault completly. >distribution of servlet.jar is not very good idea :) can I get some idea of where you are coming from with this? It seems as though rss-desk distributes much of commons. It isn't like the api will change any time soon, and there are many distributions of this that are entirly open source. Maybe you can help me learn something by your line of reasoning. My only concern is that you require the end developer to make configurations. It has always been my understanding that *if possible* builds and thier dependencies should always be relative. Remember it is only in the project for *build* purposes, it wouldn't be distributed in the WEB-INF/lib dir of the WAR. Secondly a war build would provide a simple way for developers to test thier builds in a single integrated package. It also seems that the TLD should be part of the build, maybe I am missing something but I couldn't find it in the distribution and had to build one from scratch. I think it would help developers if they didn't have to jump through these hoops. That's why I warned you about collaboration, I think I can be a signifigant contributor, but I generally am pretty involved in design. I have sun j2ee architecture and web developer certification and I have alot to offer so that means that I like to work through problems with analytical discussions. Like I said before, if this type of collaboration is something you don't want that is totally ok. I am more than happy to leave you alone. I just thought it would be better if lots of smart people work together. Clay On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 01:13, Dmitry Belov wrote: > Hi ,Clay > Please use developers mail list for any discussions > (commits list only for cvs notifications). > I think we need to leave external dependensy in build - distribution of > servlet.jar is not very good idea :) > But u right - we need this ant task. > Regards, Dmitry. |