#3 arrow from risk to risk

[Hellen Havinga]

I create a first initial risk
I create a measure (ther appears a residual risk
-The arrow does not go from initial risk to residual risk, but instead it only goes from measure to residial risk-
I connect the measure tot the residual risk.
- Now the initial risk and residual risk are connected, through the measure. So far so good -

I add an other risk to the measure.
-The arrow does not go from initial risk to the second residual risk, but instead it only goes from measure to second residial risk-

Not good. Every arrow should go from risk to risk.

[Olivier Sessink]

not true, if you add a residual risk to a measure, this is a residual risk that is not derived from a initial risk, bit caused by a measure.

For example: a residual risk from adding a firewall is that if it fails it will block everything, also the legitimate traffic.

So the issue is different: the button "Add risk" should have a better name to avoid this confusion. Perhaps "Add risk caused by measure" ?

[Hellen Havinga]

The trick is to split the residual risk, as soon as it is connected tot the initial risk. Instead of adding a risk to the measure. We should put this in the manual.

[Olivier Sessink]

I think by naming the buttons better it should work intuitively. I can't think of something short, but a long description would be:

Split --> Add another residual risk derived from the same parent risk
Add risk --> Add a risk caused by this measure

[eRROrtester]

Also reproducible:

1. Create initial risk I1
2. Select I1, add measure
3. At M1, add risk
4. Delete R1
5. Connecting line from I1 to R2 is not present between I1 and M1

[Charles Hill]

This is not a bug.