From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2003-10-24 18:04:19
|
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:06:09PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Andreas Dehmel <za...@t-...> ----- > The restriction on the C library version is too hard, however. > I changed it to 2.2.5 (which I have installed) and the code > compiled OK. Changed what? There is no test for glibc version in the filer (only in the binary, which has nothing to do with us). If you know a way to remove the symbol versioning information, please let us know! > It'd be cool if you could keep the required version(s) > as low as possible, because e.g. Debian is ``a bit'' on the > conservative side and upgrading libc is not something I consider > worthwhile to be able to build an app (one of the reasons why I > often compile my own apps when I need versions from testing, > because I don't want a libc from testing). Yes, I'm trying to avoid libc upgrades on my debian system to try and prevent this, but removing the run-time check would be the best solution. Perhaps some linker guru here knows how? Using a chroot is a partial solution, but it takes masses of disk space, and you have to maintain several of them (one for non-GUI stuff, one for GTK 2.0, one for GTK 2.2, etc) and it's generally too much work. > And I have a question regarding font size: is there any way to set > the font size for filer windows / panel? I know you can set the size > for the pinboard, but I'd like to change the size of the other fonts. They can all be set with ROX-Session (or .gtkrc-2.0 if you want to set them differently to other applications). You could also set the DPI for your monitor (see the FAQ). -- Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net tal00r at ecs.soton.ac.uk tal197 at users.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |