From: Helfried P. <hp...@st...> - 2005-01-21 11:25:22
|
Dear Roxers, is there any MacOS X port? I checked Fink (Unix OSS distribution for MacOS X) but there's only an very old and outdated port in the unstable tree. Unfortunately, ROX doesn't compile out of the box since FINK uses a different directroy structure (everything is stored in /sw) and configure complains about missing libs. All the best, Helfried |
From: Helfried P. <hp...@st...> - 2005-01-22 16:27:28
|
Hi guys, please ignore my recent email concerning compile-troubles on MacOS. Rox compiles without any problems on my machine now. Maybe, I should stop fooling around with such things while having the flu.... Thanx anyway, Helfried |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-01-22 17:17:04
|
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 05:27:21PM +0100, Helfried Peyrl wrote: > Hi guys, > > please ignore my recent email concerning compile-troubles on MacOS. Rox > compiles without any problems on my machine now. Maybe, I should stop > fooling around with such things while having the flu.... Great! Could you put some instructions on the wiki, in case other people have problems? http://rox.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/index.php/HelpInstalling Thanks, -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |
From: Tristan M. <the...@gm...> - 2005-06-06 05:32:36
|
On 21/01/05, Helfried Peyrl <hp...@st...> wrote: > Unfortunately, ROX doesn't compile out of the box since FINK uses a > different directroy structure (everything is stored in /sw) and > configure complains about missing libs. I'm having a related but different problem (on MacOS X with fink). ROX 2.2.0 seems to find most stuff okay after a bit of fiddling, but gives up unable to find the session management library. A selective output of the configure is: checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include ... checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include [yes, twice] ... checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... no configure: error: Session management library (libsm) missing. It is part of the X server distribution. Try installing the libsm-dev package. Compile failed I have SMlib.h sitting in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/SM (along with SM.h and SMproto.h). How can I go about convincing the Filer's configure they exist? --=20 Tristan |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-06-07 20:37:43
|
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:32:26PM +1000, Tristan McLeay wrote: > On 21/01/05, Helfried Peyrl <hp...@st...> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, ROX doesn't compile out of the box since FINK uses a > > different directroy structure (everything is stored in /sw) and > > configure complains about missing libs. > > I'm having a related but different problem (on MacOS X with fink). ROX > 2.2.0 seems to find most stuff okay after a bit of fiddling, but gives > up unable to find the session management library. A selective output > of the configure is: > > checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include > ... > checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers > /usr/X11R6/include [yes, twice] > ... > checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... no > configure: error: Session management library (libsm) missing. It is > part of the > X server distribution. Try installing the libsm-dev package. > Compile failed > > I have SMlib.h sitting in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/SM (along with SM.h > and SMproto.h). How can I go about convincing the Filer's configure > they exist? Possibly the AC_PATH_X in configure.in should be AC_PATH_XTRA, to actually add the located files to the flags (rerun autoconf to test). If that works, I'll change it in the sources. Otherwise, you could try symlinking /usr/X11R6/include/X11 into /usr/include. -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |
From: Tristan M. <the...@gm...> - 2005-06-07 22:21:00
|
On 08/06/05, Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:32:26PM +1000, Tristan McLeay wrote: > > I have SMlib.h sitting in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/SM (along with SM.h > > and SMproto.h). How can I go about convincing the Filer's configure > > they exist? >=20 > Possibly the AC_PATH_X in configure.in should be AC_PATH_XTRA, to > actually add the located files to the flags (rerun autoconf to test). >=20 > If that works, I'll change it in the sources. ... Yep, that's worked! Thanks! (It gave: checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability... yes checking X11/SM/SMlib.h presence... no configure: WARNING: X11/SM/SMlib.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor! configure: WARNING: X11/SM/SMlib.h: proceeding with the compiler's result checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... yes but still compiles and runs okay.) --=20 Tristan |
From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2005-06-09 16:59:23
|
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:20:53AM +1000, Tristan McLeay wrote: > On 08/06/05, Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:32:26PM +1000, Tristan McLeay wrote: > > > > I have SMlib.h sitting in /usr/X11R6/include/X11/SM (along with SM.h > > > and SMproto.h). How can I go about convincing the Filer's configure > > > they exist? > > > > Possibly the AC_PATH_X in configure.in should be AC_PATH_XTRA, to > > actually add the located files to the flags (rerun autoconf to test). > > > > If that works, I'll change it in the sources. ... > > Yep, that's worked! Thanks! (It gave: > checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability... yes > checking X11/SM/SMlib.h presence... no > configure: WARNING: X11/SM/SMlib.h: accepted by the compiler, > rejected by the preprocessor! > configure: WARNING: X11/SM/SMlib.h: proceeding with the compiler's result > checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... yes > but still compiles and runs okay.) Actually, we appear to have both AC_PATH_XTRA and AC_PATH_X! What happens if you just delete the AC_PATH_X line? -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |