Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux
Ubuntu
Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(101) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(126) |
Feb
(62) |
Mar
(96) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(61) |
Jul
(159) |
Aug
(115) |
Sep
(132) |
Oct
(65) |
Nov
(143) |
Dec
(108) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(148) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(95) |
Apr
(114) |
May
(141) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(121) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(98) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(111) |
Mar
(120) |
Apr
(111) |
May
(88) |
Jun
(102) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(140) |
Sep
(149) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(95) |
Dec
(116) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(122) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(172) |
Apr
(469) |
May
(306) |
Jun
(174) |
Jul
(120) |
Aug
(172) |
Sep
(166) |
Oct
(408) |
Nov
(112) |
Dec
(33) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(166) |
Feb
(132) |
Mar
(228) |
Apr
(150) |
May
(161) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(113) |
Aug
(227) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(124) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(104) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(91) |
Mar
(87) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(152) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(96) |
Aug
(68) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(75) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(72) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(41) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(77) |
Jun
(60) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
1
(7) |
2
(11) |
3
(12) |
4
(9) |
5
(1) |
|
6
(1) |
7
(2) |
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
(1) |
14
(1) |
15
|
16
|
17
(6) |
18
(5) |
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
(4) |
26
(1) |
|
27
(7) |
28
|
29
(1) |
30
|
|
|
|
|
From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gm...> - 2008-04-01 17:24:51
|
On 01/04/2008, Tony Houghton <h@...> wrote: [...] > I just looked at xdg-open. It's not much good at the moment because > AFAICT it works by detecting the user's desktop environment (not > including ROX) and forwarding the request to whatever it thinks is > appropriate based on that. It really needs a proper specification with > the DEs using xdg-open instead of the other way around. Presumably ROX-Session could put its own xdg-open in $PATH... -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |
|
From: Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@ky...> - 2008-04-01 17:17:41
|
Tony Houghton wrote: > In <47F25A29.6030706@...> > Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@...> wrote: > >> Tony Houghton wrote: >>> In <47F22EC7.6030707@...> >>> Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@...> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there a standard for default application bindings, like browser >>>> for html files and URI's, etc? I've seen $BROWSER and >>>> /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser and many other ways to handle this, >>>> but it would be nice if there was a standard... :) >>> I've been thinking exactly the same thing lately. And a way of >>> opening directories in a file browser (eg ROX, Nautilus, Konqueror >>> etc), but that could just be part of a general URI scheme using >>> file://. >>> >>> Can anyone start the process of creating an XDG spec or is there a >>> sort of committee? >> Here are some relevant links: >> >> http://portland.freedesktop.org/xdg-utils-1.0/ >> >> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/mime-actions-spec >> >> It's a pain in the ass that every app needs a "browser" setting and >> similar. How wonderful it would be to just shell a "xdg-open >> http://this.or.that"; regardless of what desktop and distro you're >> running. > > I just looked at xdg-open. It's not much good at the moment because > AFAICT it works by detecting the user's desktop environment (not > including ROX) and forwarding the request to whatever it thinks is > appropriate based on that. It really needs a proper specification with > the DEs using xdg-open instead of the other way around. But it could be a workaround until the DEs adapt the standard... -- /Jonatan [ http://kymatica.com ] |
|
From: Tony Houghton <h@re...> - 2008-04-01 16:09:58
|
In <47F25A29.6030706@...> Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@...> wrote: > Tony Houghton wrote: > > In <47F22EC7.6030707@...> > > Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@...> wrote: > > > >> Is there a standard for default application bindings, like browser > >> for html files and URI's, etc? I've seen $BROWSER and > >> /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser and many other ways to handle this, > >> but it would be nice if there was a standard... :) > > > > I've been thinking exactly the same thing lately. And a way of > > opening directories in a file browser (eg ROX, Nautilus, Konqueror > > etc), but that could just be part of a general URI scheme using > > file://. > > > > Can anyone start the process of creating an XDG spec or is there a > > sort of committee? > > Here are some relevant links: > > http://portland.freedesktop.org/xdg-utils-1.0/ > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/mime-actions-spec > > It's a pain in the ass that every app needs a "browser" setting and > similar. How wonderful it would be to just shell a "xdg-open > http://this.or.that"; regardless of what desktop and distro you're > running. I just looked at xdg-open. It's not much good at the moment because AFAICT it works by detecting the user's desktop environment (not including ROX) and forwarding the request to whatever it thinks is appropriate based on that. It really needs a proper specification with the DEs using xdg-open instead of the other way around. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
|
From: Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@ky...> - 2008-04-01 15:52:26
|
Tony Houghton wrote: > In <47F22EC7.6030707@...> > Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@...> wrote: > >> Is there a standard for default application bindings, like browser for >> html files and URI's, etc? I've seen $BROWSER and >> /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser and many other ways to handle this, >> but it would be nice if there was a standard... :) > > I've been thinking exactly the same thing lately. And a way of opening > directories in a file browser (eg ROX, Nautilus, Konqueror etc), but > that could just be part of a general URI scheme using file://. > > Can anyone start the process of creating an XDG spec or is there a sort > of committee? Here are some relevant links: http://portland.freedesktop.org/xdg-utils-1.0/ http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/mime-actions-spec It's a pain in the ass that every app needs a "browser" setting and similar. How wonderful it would be to just shell a "xdg-open http://this.or.that"; regardless of what desktop and distro you're running. -- /Jonatan [ http://kymatica.com ] |
|
From: Tony Houghton <h@re...> - 2008-04-01 13:17:32
|
In <47F22EC7.6030707@...> Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@...> wrote: > Is there a standard for default application bindings, like browser for > html files and URI's, etc? I've seen $BROWSER and > /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser and many other ways to handle this, > but it would be nice if there was a standard... :) I've been thinking exactly the same thing lately. And a way of opening directories in a file browser (eg ROX, Nautilus, Konqueror etc), but that could just be part of a general URI scheme using file://. Can anyone start the process of creating an XDG spec or is there a sort of committee? -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk |
|
From: Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon@ky...> - 2008-04-01 12:47:13
|
Is there a standard for default application bindings, like browser for html files and URI's, etc? I've seen $BROWSER and /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser and many other ways to handle this, but it would be nice if there was a standard... :) -- /Jonatan [ http://kymatica.com ] |
|
From: Bernd Eggink <monoped@su...> - 2008-04-01 08:04:33
|
Alex Austin schrieb: > does "killall -HUP ROX-Filer" work? Yes, but it simply kills the filer - with or without HUP. Bernd -- Bernd Eggink monoped@... http://sudrala.de |