From: <da...@da...> - 2000-07-07 09:42:34
|
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 07:40:48PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > [ I'm getting a bit confused about which of these messages actually > appeared on the list. Sorry if anyone gets this twice! ] Sorry about that, I realised Sourceforge don't use a Reply-To: header. > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 da...@da... wrote: > > BTW, what compiler are you using? I get an executable of 180,244 > > bytes. > > egcs-2.91.66 (unless someone's upgraded since I did my tests). Ah, that would explain it. I'm using 2.95.2. > Pinboard support is coming along quite well. I've committed the latest > version to CVS now. > > The way it works is that you run the filer as, eg: > > $ ROX-Filer/AppRun --pinboard MyPinboard I just gave it a whirl and it's very nice, with only a few K extra bloat. Netscape should hire you just to sort out their bloat problems with Mozilla :) (A browser taking up 30MB RAM is not nice). -- Darren Winsper (El Capitano) - ICQ #8899775 Stellar Legacy project member - http://stellarlegacy.sourceforge.net DVD boycotts. Are you doing your bit? This message was typed before a live studio audience. |