From: Silvan <dmm...@us...> - 2003-05-24 00:34:53
|
I have a thought... After a release, why not up the version number then and there? We could be at 0.9.5cvs or something, and then switch to 0.9.5 during the rc phase. Once the release is out, switch to 1.0cvs or whatever. It would make it easier to keep old release builds separate from old (or current) CVS builds when trying old versions to see when a problem cropped up. I spent a bit of time today testing, only to realize I was using 0.9.0-release instead of 0.9.0-cvs-from-yesterday. Is it a big PITA to change the VERSION? -- Michael McIntyre USDA zone 6b in SW VA, USA Silvan <dmm...@us...> Linux Druid ----------[ registered Linux user #243621 ]--------- http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/index.html |
From: Guillaume L. <gla...@te...> - 2003-05-24 16:18:31
|
On Saturday 24 May 2003 02:34, Silvan wrote: > Is it a big PITA to change the VERSION? Not really, your suggestion makes sense. The only problem is that since we don't really stick to a release roadmap, it's hard to fix the what the next release's version number will be. Anyway, I suppose we can always switch to 0.9.1cvs, if everyone's ok with that. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org |
From: Silvan <dmm...@us...> - 2003-05-24 16:47:24
|
On Saturday 24 May 2003 12:18 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Saturday 24 May 2003 02:34, Silvan wrote: > > Is it a big PITA to change the VERSION? > > Not really, your suggestion makes sense. The only problem is that since we > don't really stick to a release roadmap, it's hard to fix the what the next > release's version number will be. Yeah, that's why I said "1.0cvs or whatever" :) I thought about that, but even if we go from 0.9.1cvs to 0.9.5 it would still serve its purpose I think. -- Michael McIntyre USDA zone 6b in SW VA, USA Silvan <dmm...@us...> Linux Druid ----------[ registered Linux user #243621 ]--------- http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/index.html |