Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Panning Laws revisited

[Chris C. <ca...@al...>]

On 12 March 2013 15:45, Tim Munro <or...@le...> wrote:
> Because the same panning law is always applied to both instrument and
> submaster

Hmm.. is that a good idea? I'd have thought a stereo submaster wants
either plain balance or a stereo pan, rather than a positional
mono-to-stereo pan law? Perhaps I'm overcomplicating the matter in my
head. Otherwise your approach sounds sensible.

This subject also seems to have come up on LAD in the mean time, from
a MusE developer --

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2013-March/033690.html


Chris