From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2007-06-22 09:19:01
|
On Friday 22 June 2007 10:05, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > Seems notes are in a triplet group, but they do not form a beamed group > although they have a common beam. I'm not sure what you mean there. They're in a group of type "tupled" -- a group can only have one type. Rosegarden has also given them a (deduced) Beamed property. > Another error is that it seems like single notes are in their own note > groups. That's supposed to be legitimate in Rosegarden's representation, although it was perhaps a mistake to make it so as it does make things harder to handle sometimes. Chris |