From: Peter M. <ap...@bi...> - 2005-10-06 14:06:52
|
Peter Mogensen wrote: > Correct... But some decision needs to be made about in which direction > the notation capabilities of RG should develop. You could manage a lot > of the currently missing features like repeats and score-layout with > dialogues of options and segment properties. > That would give a nice WYSIWYG notation editor, but probaby be just as > powerful and easier to implement. > Sorry... It should have read: "That would NOT give a nice WYSIWYG..." (and "probably") Peter |