Re: [Rosegarden-devel] more on lilypond export

[Richard B. <bo...@bo...>]

On Thursday 18 September 2003 12:06 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:

> There were certainly voices raised about the document operator= thing
> back in January.

I was really pissed off about that actually.  The reason I did that was to provide
a controlled path through to the document loading model we have now (in a two stage
affair) and despite the fact I spelled it all out loads of times before and as I was
doing it you and G still delighted in getting all bristly about it when all the hard 
work had been done.  Without the operator= work we wouldn't have got out of the
first mess we were in (which was pretty horrendous).

Fuckers.

B