From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-30 05:21:10
|
Bugs item #1309166, was opened at 2005-09-30 05:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dmmcintyr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104932&aid=1309166&group_id=4932 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: segment canvas Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: D. Michael McIntyre (dmmcintyr) Assigned to: Guillaume Laurent (glaurent) Summary: segment moving not as "snappy" Initial Comment: I'm filing this as a generic priority 5 bug because I'm too lazy to compare 1.0 to CVS and see what's what. I notice that I keep winding up with segments that appear to start at the very beginning, but they are in fact off by some trivial amount, which throws the notation out of whack (eg. with a weird 64th rest in the first bar, and red barlines throughout.) I have to fix this by going in and manually setting the start time of each segment. I never used to have to do that, so I conclude that something has changed in a negative way. Boo hoo hoo. I'm open to suggestions as to what, exactly, has changed, and how I can work around it in the brave new world. Gut, not empirical study, says that segments used to snap to sane boundaries when they were jiggled, and they're not snapping anymore. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: D. Michael McIntyre (dmmcintyr) Date: 2005-09-30 05:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=663564 OK, now I'm just flat pissed off. Stupid, useless piece of crap! What good is this thing anyway? New segment, 50 bars long. Shift click drag to track 2, release, shift click drag to track 3, release, open all three in notation view, and they don't start at the same $INSERT_LOTS_OF_EXPLETIVES_HERE measure. It's a completely useless $INSERT_MORE_EXPLETIVES_HERE. The only way to get there and have it come out right is to use ^C ^V copy/pasting. No, even at that. It's just too damn easy to get something off by some trivial amount. I just inserted a dotted whole rest into bar one segment one, bar one segment two (segment two was ^V pasted with the playback cursor at full rewind) and then into bar one, segment three (which I put the playback pointer back to the start by clicking the ruler) and the one in bar three is causing weird double dotted 64th note bullshit to happen. The segment is not at precisely 1:0:0 or 0:1:1 or whatever it's supposed to be at. Useless pile of crap. :( I'll have to really look at all of this when I'm more sober, but I guess the bottom line is I won't be using Rosegarden for anything useful tonight. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: D. Michael McIntyre (dmmcintyr) Date: 2005-09-30 05:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=663564 Changed my mind about the priority. Move them all to start at the very beginning by hand, and go into one of the bars with the weird rest. Collapse rest. The weird rest moves ahead one bar. Select all, collapse rests, and now I have a total mess with a double dotted whole rest in bar 1, nothing in bar 2, double dotted whole rest in bar 3. Eff this bee ess. I guess I have to hose these segments and start over, and try not to accidentally wiggle one by one pixel. This really pretty royally sucks. WTF is this stupid nonsense? I never had this problem before. It must, therefore, be new. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104932&aid=1309166&group_id=4932 |