Menu
▾
▴
rlib-users
|
From: Evan G. <ve...@gm...> - 2006-09-14 22:01:09
|
First off we'd like to thank you for this software, it's the best we've found (and we've searched a lot) for what we're doing and it works great. >From the list we saw that rlib 2.0 is planned to be released soon. Is there a time frame on that? Is there a list of features the new version will have? We're trying to give our IT guys some fair warning before we have them working on this. Thank you for your time, -Evan |
|
From: Bob D. <bd...@si...> - 2006-09-18 16:59:59
|
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Evan Gates wrote: > First off we'd like to thank you for this software, it's the best > we've found (and we've searched a lot) for what we're doing and it > works great. Thanks! > > >From the list we saw that rlib 2.0 is planned to be released soon. Is > there a time frame on that? Is there a list of features the new > version will have? We're trying to give our IT guys some fair warning > before we have them working on this. RLIB 2.0 is really going to be a re-branding of the latest stable release: 1.3.8. At this point the wiki's documentation just needs to get in line w/ all of RLIB's features. Thats the only thing holding it back. - Bob |
|
From: Bob D. <bd...@si...> - 2006-09-18 19:42:35
|
I can probably work my way through the whole RLIB source and stub out the documentation. I'll do it if others are willing to beef it up. Any volunteers? - Bob On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:16 +0200, Michiel wrote: > Bob, (and all other Rlib users) > > If I can get more extensive examples of all the new features I'm willing > to get the docs more complete. > Or do you have other plans? > > Michiel > > > Bob Doan wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Evan Gates wrote: > > > >> First off we'd like to thank you for this software, it's the best > >> we've found (and we've searched a lot) for what we're doing and it > >> works great. > >> > > > > Thanks! > > > > > >> >From the list we saw that rlib 2.0 is planned to be released soon. Is > >> there a time frame on that? Is there a list of features the new > >> version will have? We're trying to give our IT guys some fair warning > >> before we have them working on this. > >> > > > > RLIB 2.0 is really going to be a re-branding of the latest stable > > release: 1.3.8. > > > > At this point the wiki's documentation just needs to get in line w/ all > > of RLIB's features. Thats the only thing holding it back. > > > > - Bob > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Rlib-users mailing list > > Rli...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users > > > > -- |
|
From: Brian M. <bm...@se...> - 2006-09-18 19:48:38
|
I am available to help with this. -----Original Message----- From: rli...@li... [mailto:rli...@li...] On Behalf Of Bob Doan Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 3:42 PM To: Michiel Cc: RLIB USERS Subject: Re: [Rlib-users] Time frame for rlib 2.0 I can probably work my way through the whole RLIB source and stub out the documentation. I'll do it if others are willing to beef it up. Any volunteers? - Bob On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:16 +0200, Michiel wrote: > Bob, (and all other Rlib users) >=20 > If I can get more extensive examples of all the new features I'm willing=20 > to get the docs more complete. > Or do you have other plans? >=20 > Michiel >=20 >=20 > Bob Doan wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Evan Gates wrote: > > =20 > >> First off we'd like to thank you for this software, it's the best > >> we've found (and we've searched a lot) for what we're doing and it > >> works great. > >> =20 > > > > Thanks! > > > > =20 > >> >From the list we saw that rlib 2.0 is planned to be released soon. Is > >> there a time frame on that? Is there a list of features the new > >> version will have? We're trying to give our IT guys some fair warning > >> before we have them working on this. > >> =20 > > > > RLIB 2.0 is really going to be a re-branding of the latest stable > > release: 1.3.8. > > > > At this point the wiki's documentation just needs to get in line w/ all > > of RLIB's features. Thats the only thing holding it back. > > > > - Bob > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Rlib-users mailing list > > Rli...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users > > > > =20 --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDE V _______________________________________________ Rlib-users mailing list Rli...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users |
|
From: Michiel B. <mi...@be...> - 2006-09-18 21:46:39
|
So am I (the beefing up part) Brian Morton wrote: > I am available to help with this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: rli...@li... > [mailto:rli...@li...] On Behalf Of Bob Doan > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 3:42 PM > To: Michiel > Cc: RLIB USERS > Subject: Re: [Rlib-users] Time frame for rlib 2.0 > > I can probably work my way through the whole RLIB source and stub out > the documentation. I'll do it if others are willing to beef it up. Any > volunteers? > > - Bob > > On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:16 +0200, Michiel wrote: > >> Bob, (and all other Rlib users) >> >> If I can get more extensive examples of all the new features I'm >> > willing > >> to get the docs more complete. >> Or do you have other plans? >> >> Michiel >> >> >> Bob Doan wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Evan Gates wrote: >>> >>> >>>> First off we'd like to thank you for this software, it's the best >>>> we've found (and we've searched a lot) for what we're doing and it >>>> works great. >>>> >>>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>>> >From the list we saw that rlib 2.0 is planned to be released soon. >>>> > Is > >>>> there a time frame on that? Is there a list of features the new >>>> version will have? We're trying to give our IT guys some fair >>>> > warning > >>>> before we have them working on this. >>>> >>>> >>> RLIB 2.0 is really going to be a re-branding of the latest stable >>> release: 1.3.8. >>> >>> At this point the wiki's documentation just needs to get in line w/ >>> > all > >>> of RLIB's features. Thats the only thing holding it back. >>> >>> - Bob >>> >>> >>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > >>> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, >>> > security? > >>> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your >>> > job easier > >>> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache >>> > Geronimo > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rlib-users mailing list >>> Rli...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users >>> >>> >>> |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X