rlib-users

[Rlib-users] doubt in breaks

[Everton L. B. <ev...@fa...>]

Why the difference between
       <BreakFields>
         <BreakField value=3D"turma_codigo"/>
         <BreakField value=3D"ies_codigo"/>
         <BreakField value=3D"reconhecido"/>
         <BreakField value=3D"turno_turno"/>
       </BreakFields>

and
       <BreakFields>
         <BreakField value=3D"turma_codigo + ies_codigo + reconhecido +=20
turno_turno"/>
       </BreakFields>
?
I tested and the output was different.

--=20
Everton Lu=EDs Berz

Re: [Rlib-users] doubt in breaks

[Bob D. <bd...@si...>]

Hi,


On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:27 -0300, Everton Luis Berz wrote:
> Why the difference between
>        <BreakFields>
>          <BreakField value="turma_codigo"/>
>          <BreakField value="ies_codigo"/>
>          <BreakField value="reconhecido"/>
>          <BreakField value="turno_turno"/>
>        </BreakFields>

This feature should be considered deprecated.  I Did this before RLIB
1.0 because at that time RLIB could not do expressions.

> 
> and
>        <BreakFields>
>          <BreakField value="turma_codigo + ies_codigo + reconhecido + 
> turno_turno"/>
>        </BreakFields>
> ?
> I tested and the output was different.
> 

This is the correct way to do it

Which way works correctly for you?

- Bob

Re: [Rlib-users] doubt in breaks

[Everton L. B. <ev...@fa...>]

Hi,

Bob Doan escreveu:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:27 -0300, Everton Luis Berz wrote:
> 
>>Why the difference between
>>       <BreakFields>
>>         <BreakField value="turma_codigo"/>
>>         <BreakField value="ies_codigo"/>
>>         <BreakField value="reconhecido"/>
>>         <BreakField value="turno_turno"/>
>>       </BreakFields>
> 
> 
> This feature should be considered deprecated.  I Did this before RLIB
> 1.0 because at that time RLIB could not do expressions.
> 
> 
>>and
>>       <BreakFields>
>>         <BreakField value="turma_codigo + ies_codigo + reconhecido + 
>>turno_turno"/>
>>       </BreakFields>
>>?
>>I tested and the output was different.
>>
> 
> 
> This is the correct way to do it
> 
> Which way works correctly for you?
The second way (expressions).


> 
> - Bob
> 
> 

Thanks,
Everton