Al:
No - Shouldn't be.
Best Regards,
Mike
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:19 -0500, Al Arzaga wrote:
> Then is there any point to the layout attribute in a <part> tag?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Roth [mailto:mr...@si...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:06 PM
> To: Al Arzaga
> Cc: RLIB USERS
> Subject: Re: [Rlib-users] flow and fixed parts
>
>
> Al:
>
> There really is no difference between fixed and flow parts - this needs
> to be removed.
>
> The modularity your are referring is independent of parts. However,
> using different files to include things like headers and footers is
> a great way of creating a common code base/look and feel among reports.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:04 -0500, Al Arzaga wrote:
> > Am I right to assume that the major difference between flow and fixed
> parts
> > is that flow parts involve storing the reports modularly in different xml
> > files, while fixed parts mean you store everything in one monolithic xml
> > file?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rlib-users mailing list
> > Rli...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Rlib-users mailing list
> Rli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users
|