rlib-devel

[Rlib-devel] add_function capability and pcode.h

[William K. V. <wk...@us...>]

Hi,
	I notice that pcode.h is not installed in /usr/include/rlib
however to be able to write a function which can be "add"ed it
pretty much needs defined:

rlib_value_stack_pop
RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_STRING
RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_NUMBER
rlib_value_new_string
rlib_value_new_number

So should those definitions migrate to rlib.h or (the quickest)
add pcode.h to the list of installed headers.

Thoughts/preferences?

Cheers,
William.

Re: [Rlib-devel] add_function capability and pcode.h

[Bob D. <bd...@si...>]

My vote is to install pcode.h because if you are going to to make custom
RLIB functions you clearly know what you are doing and probably want
thew full pcode stack

- bob

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:54 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> Hi,
> 	I notice that pcode.h is not installed in /usr/include/rlib
> however to be able to write a function which can be "add"ed it
> pretty much needs defined:
> 
> rlib_value_stack_pop
> RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_STRING
> RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_NUMBER
> rlib_value_new_string
> rlib_value_new_number
> 
> So should those definitions migrate to rlib.h or (the quickest)
> add pcode.h to the list of installed headers.
> 
> Thoughts/preferences?
> 
> Cheers,
> William.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Rlib-devel mailing list
> Rli...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-devel

Re: [Rlib-devel] add_function capability and pcode.h

[William K. V. <wk...@us...>]

The attached patch modifies Makefile.am to include pcode.h in the
list of installed header files.

On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:35 -0400, Bob Doan wrote:
> My vote is to install pcode.h because if you are going to to make custom
> RLIB functions you clearly know what you are doing and probably want
> thew full pcode stack
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:54 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> > 	I notice that pcode.h is not installed in /usr/include/rlib
> > however to be able to write a function which can be "add"ed it
> > pretty much needs defined:
> > 
> > rlib_value_stack_pop
> > RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_STRING
> > RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_NUMBER
> > rlib_value_new_string
> > rlib_value_new_number
> > 
> > So should those definitions migrate to rlib.h or (the quickest)
> > add pcode.h to the list of installed headers.

Re: [Rlib-devel] add_function capability and pcode.h

[Bob D. <bd...@si...>]

Applied

On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 20:37 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> The attached patch modifies Makefile.am to include pcode.h in the
> list of installed header files.
> 
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:35 -0400, Bob Doan wrote:
> > My vote is to install pcode.h because if you are going to to make custom
> > RLIB functions you clearly know what you are doing and probably want
> > thew full pcode stack
> > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:54 -0600, William K. Volkman wrote:
> > > 	I notice that pcode.h is not installed in /usr/include/rlib
> > > however to be able to write a function which can be "add"ed it
> > > pretty much needs defined:
> > > 
> > > rlib_value_stack_pop
> > > RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_STRING
> > > RLIB_VALUE_GET_AS_NUMBER
> > > rlib_value_new_string
> > > rlib_value_new_number
> > > 
> > > So should those definitions migrate to rlib.h or (the quickest)
> > > add pcode.h to the list of installed headers.
>