From: Mike R. <mr...@si...> - 2005-04-06 21:40:04
|
Al: No - Shouldn't be. Best Regards, Mike On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:19 -0500, Al Arzaga wrote: > Then is there any point to the layout attribute in a <part> tag? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Roth [mailto:mr...@si...] > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:06 PM > To: Al Arzaga > Cc: RLIB USERS > Subject: Re: [Rlib-users] flow and fixed parts > > > Al: > > There really is no difference between fixed and flow parts - this needs > to be removed. > > The modularity your are referring is independent of parts. However, > using different files to include things like headers and footers is > a great way of creating a common code base/look and feel among reports. > > Best Regards, > > Mike > > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:04 -0500, Al Arzaga wrote: > > Am I right to assume that the major difference between flow and fixed > parts > > is that flow parts involve storing the reports modularly in different xml > > files, while fixed parts mean you store everything in one monolithic xml > > file? > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Rlib-users mailing list > > Rli...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Rlib-users mailing list > Rli...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rlib-users |